* Damian Conway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060315 01:52]:
> That's why the general Perl 6 Pod syntax allows any block construct to be
> labelled:
>
> =begin comment (explanation)
> The devil made me write this code
> =end comment
>
> =begin comment (future implementation)
> Add a :devil option
> =end comment
>
> =begin comment (design)
> See www.dev.il/design/S25.pod
> =end comment
>
> =begin comment (etc. etc.)
> >:-)
> =end comment
But are we still applying huffman encoding here? I mean: do we really
write that little comments that long constructs are acceptable?
What about
=comment explain
The devil made me write this code
=comment future
Add a :devil option
=comment design
See www.dev.il/design/S25.pod
=comment etc. etc.
>:-)
=cut
Much cleaner, and I don't like Pascal.
--
Regards,
MarkOv
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Overmeer MSc MARKOV Solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://Mark.Overmeer.net http://solutions.overmeer.net
