On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 10:46:02PM +0200, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 14:35:52 -0600, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> > I think that if C<temp> is the new C<local>, then immediately after the
> > C<temp $x> line, $x should hold whatever flavor of undef is appropriate.
> > Is there some reason we're huffmannizing
> Because 90% of the code that people use local for in perl 5 is for
> counting levels and automatically unwrapping them. The other 10% are
> for more complex values.
Make me believe your 90/10 numbers.
Jonathan Scott Duff