Author: larry
Date: Sat Apr 15 18:38:36 2006
New Revision: 8700

Modified:
   doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
   doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod

Log:
Cleanup typos.


Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
==============================================================================
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod        (original)
+++ doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod        Sat Apr 15 18:38:36 2006
@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@
 
   Maintainer: Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Date: 10 Aug 2004
-  Last Modified: 10 Apr 2006
+  Last Modified: 15 Apr 2006
   Number: 2
-  Version: 22
+  Version: 23
 
 This document summarizes Apocalypse 2, which covers small-scale
 lexical items and typological issues.  (These Synopses also contain
@@ -533,9 +533,9 @@
 positional, named, and so on.
 
 Like C<List> objects, C<Capture> objects are immutable in the abstract, but
-evaluates its arguments lazily.  Before everything inside a C<Capture> are
+evaluate their arguments lazily.  Before everything inside a C<Capture> is
 fully evaluated (which happens at compile time when all the arguments are
-constants), the eventual value may well be unknown.  All we know is that is
+constants), the eventual value may well be unknown.  All we know is
 that we have the promise to make the bits of it immutable as they become known.
 
 C<Capture> objects may contain multiple unresolved iterators such as pipes

Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
==============================================================================
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod        (original)
+++ doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod        Sat Apr 15 18:38:36 2006
@@ -13,9 +13,9 @@
 
   Maintainer: Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Date: 21 Mar 2003
-  Last Modified: 6 Apr 2006
+  Last Modified: 15 Apr 2006
   Number: 6
-  Version: 23
+  Version: 24
 
 
 This document summarizes Apocalypse 6, which covers subroutines and the
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@
 so that you can use more descriptive internal parameter names without
 imposing inconveniently long external labels on named arguments.
 
-Capture that correspond to named parameters are evaluated in scalar
+Arguments that correspond to named parameters are evaluated in scalar
 context. They can only be passed by name, so it doesn't matter what
 order you pass them in, so long as they don't intermingle with any
 positional arguments:

Reply via email to