On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 09:24:09AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> First, let me say I really like the changes to S05. Good work
> once again.
> Here are my questions and comments.
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:07:51AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -(To get rule interpolation use an assertion - see below)
> > +However, if C<$var> contains a rule object, rather attempting to
> > +convert it to a string, it is called as if you said C<< <$var> >>.
> Does this mean it's a capturing rule? Or is it called as
> if one had said C<< <?var> >>? (I would prefer it default
> to non-capturing.)
Sorry, I meant C<< <?$var> >> here, except we don't really
have a <?$var> syntax, so my question is just if it's capturing
or non-capturing. (I still prefer non-capturing.)