On 5/15/06, Audrey Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rob Kinyon wrote:
> I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be very feasible to do this natively in
> P5. But, would it be possible to do it natively in P6? As in,
> supported within the interpreter vs. through some sort of overloading.
Look at "is atomic" in S17draft, and Software Transaction Memory in general?
Would there be a way for me to say "Yes, I understand that Perl may
not generically understand how to revert this outside resource, such
as a database, but I do." and do a catch-type block for the revert?