> Reduce operators only turn infix into list operators. What you really
> want here is a hyper-fatarrow:
> my %h = @k »=>« @v;
Ah, right. Silly me. I got hyper and reduce confused. Thanks!
Gaal pointed out using zip. What would be the difference then between a
hyper-fatarrow and zip in this case?
Effectively none. But I think the hyper-notation is clearer here. Both ¥
and => make pairs, but at least to me, => conveys more explicitly that it's
not just any old pair but specifically a key/value pair. (Even though =>
also creates Pairs of the "any old" kind.)
Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>