On 8/31/06, Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Still, though, How would you specify :g? It doesn't make a lot of sense
on rx// -- just like you can't use it with qr// in Perl 5.

It is a good point that it doesn't belong on the regex.  Perhaps:

   $foo.subst(/bar/, "baz", :g)

That seems to work, though the weight is at the front again.  Oh.

   $foo.subst(:g, /bar/, "baz")

I don't think using a method (even if called "s") is good huffman
coding. My expectation is that copying substitution will be used much -
perhaps even more than mutating substitution!

And so a method called "s" is poor huffman coding... why? (I do agree
with your frequency conjecture)


Reply via email to