> Yes. He also accepted the proposal to add min and max operators - > although I'm unsure why they weren't included as functions/methods > instead. It seems more natural to me to say 'max($a, $b, $c)' or > '($a, $b, $c).max' instead of '[max] $a, $b, $c' or '$a max $b max > $c'. Although it _does_ allow for such things as '$a max= $b' (which > is shorthand for something like '$a = $b if $a < $b'). And I suppose > that '&infix:<max>' doesn't stop you from having '&max' as well.
In true chicken and egg fashion: Which comes first the operator or the function. Do you define &infix:<max> in terms of &max or vice versa. My guess is the operators should win because there could be some low-level shenanigans that optimize things. But maybe not. Paul
