Ovid wrote:
(reversed the message a bit)
> is 'b', any('a' .. 'h'), 'junctions should work';
This looks like a Test "bug"; it's doing something like:
is 'b', 'a' # not ok
is 'b', 'b' # ok
is 'b', 'c' # not ok
...
If you write:
ok 'b' === any('a'..'h')
The result is one passing test.
> That outputs something like the following on my system (Version: 6.2.13
> (r14927))
>
> any(VInt 1,VInt 2,VInt 3,VInt 4)
> any(VRef <Scalar:0x2aa80e0>)
My question is, what is the expected output of say-ing a junction?
Should "say (1|2|3)" randomly print 1, 2, or 3? Should "say (1&2&3)"
say 1, then say 2, then say 3?
I can understand it going either way (although I'd lean towards what
Ovid is expecting), but it would be good to hear what others think
before tests are committed.
--
package JAPH;use Catalyst qw/-Debug/;($;=JAPH)->config(name => do {
$,.=reverse qw[Jonathan tsu rehton lre rekca Rockway][$_].[split //,
";$;"]->[$_].q; ;for 1..4;$,=~s;^.;;;$,});$;->setup;
