?? and !! could always return some kind of result object that boolizes
to true or false.
Audrey Tang wrote:
> 在 Jun 11, 2007 5:10 AM 時，Jonathan Lang 寫到：
>> A variation of chaining associativity gets
>> used, with the "chaining rule" being '$v1 op1 $v2 // $v1 op2 $v3'
>> instead of '$v1 op1 $v2 && $v2 op2 $v3', as is the case for comparison
> But wouldn't that make:
> True ?? undef !! Moose;
> evaluate to Moose, instead of undef as we wanted?