Larry Wall writes:

> I have a problem with both extremes, and I want to solve it with a
> dose of postmodern apathy.  It may seem a bit insane, but I think that
> in
>     print qq:to/END/
>     =for whatever
>     END
> I would prefer that the =for is considered Pod by any standard Pod
> parser, but is *not* considered Pod by the Perl 6 parser.  And I think
> that's just fine.

I like it!

Is that a decision yet, or were you just thinking out loud?


Reply via email to