> Other available chars: > > <`ws> > <^ws> > <&ws> > <*ws> > <-ws> > <|ws> > <:ws> > <;ws> > </ws>
I'd vote for <:ws> which is vaguely reminiscent of the former non-capturing parens (?:). It (<:ws>) also bears little similarity to any other regex construct - although it looks a bit like a Perl 6 pair. Paul
