On Apr 30, 2008, at 15:14 , Jon Lang wrote:
only is "is :strictly Dog" more legible, but it leaves room for the possible future inclusion of adjective-based syntax such as "big Dog"
It occurs to me that we already have this: we call them "types". -- brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] [EMAIL PROTECTED] system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] [EMAIL PROTECTED] electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH
