Jonathan (>):
> Why not just assign to $!foo, which is always read/write (since the rw
> affects whether you get an accessor that is read/write or not - $!foo refers
> to the underlying storage location; at least, that's how I understand it and
> what I think Rakudo is implementing today).

I have come to understand that this is an available possibility, yes.
That doesn't mean I like it. :)

My complaint could be pithily summarized as "those are _my_,
attributes, why can't I write to them?"

// Carl

Reply via email to