On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Timothy S. Nelson
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Leon Timmermans wrote:
>> I think most forms of IPC should be addons, if only because they have
>> inherent unportability. Stuff like sockets and pipes should be in
>> obviously, signals maybe (they have lots of portability issues, but
>> they may be too often used to just drop), but things like SysV IPC
>> really shouldn't. Anything more high level should definitely not go in
>> the core.
> Ok, I agree about the SysV IPC. Files and Sockets are in. As for
> the rest, I have another question -- should they be part of a Unix-only
I don't understand your question; what do you mean with 'they' here?
Anything not in the core doesn't have to be specced at all for now.