On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Larry Wall <la...@wall.org> wrote:
> :  I mean, prefix ops can be used in reduce, too, right?
> I will let you ponder the meaning of "reduce" a bit more, and the
> relationship of that to the respective arity of infixes vs prefixes.

Well, infixes are necessarily binary, but while prefixes tend to be
slurpy, I was thinking one could also declare a prefix op with a
finite arity.  And does [...] only reduce if what's inside is an
operator?  How do you do a reduce using a plain old binary subroutine?

Mark J. Reed <markjr...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to