David Green <david.gr...@telus.net> writes:

> The soft way -- being able to cast $dogwood as a Dog and treat it
> unambiguously so, then to do the same thing treating it as a Tree
> object -- is the most flexible.  Split-personality Dogs may be rare,
> but I can imagine wanting to call common  utility roles (e.g. Logging)
> from any point down a calling chain.

  It may be the time of day, but I imagine the Tree type may have
something to say about Logging.

Eirik, logging off
>Ever heard of .cshrc?
That's a city in Bosnia.  Right?
(Discussion in comp.os.linux.misc on the intuitiveness of commands.)

Reply via email to