David Green <david.gr...@telus.net> writes: > The soft way -- being able to cast $dogwood as a Dog and treat it > unambiguously so, then to do the same thing treating it as a Tree > object -- is the most flexible. Split-personality Dogs may be rare, > but I can imagine wanting to call common utility roles (e.g. Logging) > from any point down a calling chain.
It may be the time of day, but I imagine the Tree type may have something to say about Logging. Eirik, logging off -- >Ever heard of .cshrc? That's a city in Bosnia. Right? (Discussion in comp.os.linux.misc on the intuitiveness of commands.)
