I always think of the questions game in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern
(Lenzmoritz and Damienstern?) instead of Whose Line?.
On Tuesday, August 23, 2011, philippe.beauch...@bell.ca <
> No... LOL
> I was making reference to another Whose Line game, (as Damian was with the
all questions thing)... And the hyphen thing. :)
> Philippe R. Beauchamp
> Secure Channel | Bell Business Markets
> Associate Director - Application Services
> Phone: 613-781-8953
> Cell: 613-327-6928
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Richard Hainsworth [mailto:rich...@rusrating.ru]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 06:28 AM
> To: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: Re: [perl6/specs] a7cfe0: [S32] backtraces overhaul
> If you're asking for an explanation of the humour, then it's easy. There
> is no word play or a significant reference to a program only available
> to a special audience.
> Seems to me that when Damian got to the end of his email he noticed that
> each sentence ended in a '?'
> That's not usual. Most emails contain assertions and questions.
> The humour is really when he appended a "?" to his own name. Was he
> really questioning what he was called?
> On 08/23/2011 02:19 PM, philippe.beauch...@bell.ca wrote:
>> Help us always-explains-the-joke-man!!...
>> Philippe R. Beauchamp
>> Secure Channel | Bell Business Markets
>> Associate Director - Application Services
>> Phone: 613-781-8953
>> Cell: 613-327-6928
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Moritz Lenz [mailto:mor...@faui2k3.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 04:56 AM
>> To: email@example.com<firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> Subject: Re: [perl6/specs] a7cfe0: [S32] backtraces overhaul
>> Am 23.08.2011 10:46, schrieb Damian Conway:
>>> It's a trivial point, but why hidden_from_backtrace instead of
>>> hidden-from-backtrace? Especially given that the associated
>>> method is is-hidden, not is_hidden?
>> The current stance seems to be that low-level things are spelled with
>> underscores, while we reserve the minus character for user-space code.
>> Try grepping the specs for identifiers of built-ins that have a minus in
>> it -- I didn't find any in a quick search.
>>> And why is this entire message written in questions?
>> Is it? I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean.
>> maybe it's a charset problem on your machine, or something.
Mark J. Reed <markjr...@gmail.com>