> At least in #perl6 I've never seen anybody try to write an auto-deduced
> sequence, and fail because of floating-point errors.

Except for Martin's 1, sqrt(2), 2...8

But, yes, the widespread use of Rats rather than Nums
means only the edgiest of edge-cases fails. And as you get
an explicit Failure when it does happen, at least people will
know when the numerical computations don't work as hoped.


Reply via email to