frettled, Right, it's just the AL2 requires you to thoroughly rename the project's main name(s) if you redistribute a modified version.. -Matthew
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Jan Ingvoldstad <frett...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Moritz Lenz <mor...@faui2k3.org> wrote: > >> I have no idea if the AL2 is well suited for sets of documents, as the >> specification is. I'll leave that decision to Larry. >> > > To anyone in doubt: please note that I'm not Larry, I'm not an authority, > I'm just opinionated. :) > > Considering that the specification is sortof actually a language > specification, I think there should at least be some terms regarding how > this should apply. > > Forking the documentation, or creating derivative works, shouldn't be a > problem, as long as it doesn't change the specification in itself, and > thereby create confusion regarding what the Perl 6 specification is. > > Technically speaking, there shouldn't be a problem with pulling the Git > repository, making changes, and proposing that these changes should be > merged with the central Git repository for the specification – that is, > after all, an approximation of how the specification is changed and > developed by the community. > -- > Jan > -- Sent by the Internet --------------------------------------------------------------------- Login to LinkedIn to see my whole profile and Connect http://linkedin.com/in/mattswilson
