On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Fields, Christopher J
> I have a fairly simple question regarding the feasibility of using grammars
> with commonly used biological data formats.
> My main question: if I wanted to parse() or subparse() vary large files (not
> unheard of to have FASTA/FASTQ or other similar data files exceed 100’s of
> GB) would a grammar be the best solution? For instance, based on what I am
> reading the semantics appear to be greedy; for instance:
> appears to be a convenient shorthand for:
> since Grammar.parse() works on a Str, not a IO::Handle or Buf. Or am I
> misunderstanding how this could be accomplished?
My understanding is it is intended that parsing can work on Cats
(hypothetical lazy strings) but this hasn't been implemented yet
Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com
HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com