At 16:24 -0700 2000.09.10, Russ Allbery wrote:
>Then I guess we'll have to agree to disagree, as in my opinion you didn't
>prove anything,
I absolutely proved that the software licensed AL-only is known to be free
software. I also accept that some, maybe many, people think it is not.
But that does not make my statement any less true.
>willing to go through that again. I'm sorry. I was assuming some general
>familiarity with the common complaints about the AL.
I do have such familiarity. But you cannot just say "the AL is flawed" and
then expect me to come up with your arguments for you. If you have
arguments, you present them. It's just odd that you expect me to argue
against arguments you haven't even presented here.
--
Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/
