> On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> > I personally think that the relying on LGPL'ed code is completely
> > reasonable. Some will disagree, so we need to come to a consensus on this
> > as a community.
Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. What are the consequences for those who redistribute software based on
> or including perl6? This is a licensing issue that I do not feel
> competent to address, and hence won't.
I can likely help address these, when the time comes.
What I expected would happen would be that other working groups would make a
decision on the *technology*, roughly "ignoring" the licensing, and
referring it to to the Licensing Working Group and saying: "Ok, what are the
consequences if we use this."
There seems no point in considering hypotheticals until a technological
decision is made.
Bradley M. Kuhn - http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn