Chris Nandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > True, unless we stick to the same licensing scheme we have today for perl, > which, like it or not, has served Perl very, very well. As it turns out, this isn't an RFC under consideration by Larry, AFAIK. The only RFC about licensing that went in was (Artistic-2.0|GPL). -- Bradley M. Kuhn - http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn
- Re: licensing issues John van V
- Re: licensing issues Dan Sugalski
- Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
- Re: licensing issues Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
- Re: licensing issues Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: licensing issues Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: licensing issues Simon Cozens
- Re: licensing issues Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: licensing issues David Grove
- Re: licensing issues Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: licensing issues Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: licensing issues John van V
- Re: licensing issues John van V