Chris Nandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> True, unless we stick to the same licensing scheme we have today for perl,
> which, like it or not, has served Perl very, very well.

As it turns out, this isn't an RFC under consideration by Larry, AFAIK.  The
only RFC about licensing that went in was (Artistic-2.0|GPL).

Bradley M. Kuhn  -

PGP signature

Reply via email to