Re: Request for Clarification: RFC Statuses

[Michael G Schwern]

On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 01:35:42AM -0400, Adam Turoff wrote:
> Background: RFCs should be in development until frozen or retired.
> 
> Problem: Frozen RFCs are being updated.

Solution #4:  Slip the RFC status back to 'developing'.

If someone updates a frozen RFC, its obviously developing again.  The
new RFC will require review.  Then the maintainer can change the
status back to frozen, or continue updating.


'Biologists have a term for things which are stable.  It is "dead".'


-- 

Michael G Schwern      http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just Another Stupid Consultant                      Perl6 Kwalitee Ashuranse
I worship Satan and Santa likes me better than you.
        -- Diablo  www.goats.com