On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, David Grove wrote: > Censorship, the type the I've opposed in the Perl community, is that which > provides the benefit of false impressions (a.k.a. marketing by fraud by > ommission of the truth) for the procurement of the almighty dollar. > I'm not suggesting censorship. I'm questioning O'Reilly's position. With all due respect, David, that's not what censorship means. Censorship is simply the act of deleting material which is considered, in the judgement of the censor, sensitive or harmful. It has nothing NECESSARILY to do with the almighty dollar, and stating that it does is simply clouding the issue. This thread has gone on for a long time, and is starting to repeat itself...could we please let it go? Dave Storrs
- Re: Critique available Nathan Torkington
- Re: Critique available Bennett Todd
- Re: Critique available Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available David Grove
- Re: Critique available iain truskett
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available Nathan Torkington
- Re: Critique available David Grove
- Re: Critique available Nathan Torkington
- Re: Critique available Dave Storrs
- Re: Critique available David Grove
- Re: Critique available Andy Dougherty
- Re: Critique available Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Critique available Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: Critique available Bart Lateur
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available John Porter
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available John Porter
- Re: Critique available Dan Sugalski