Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)

[Bryan C . Warnock]

On Thursday 22 February 2001 16:56, Edward Peschko wrote:
> Here for example was something that was totally missed in the RFCs and 
*should*
> be spec'd out (I believe):

Yes, totally missed....
   http://dev.perl.org/rfc/78.pod

-- 
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]