* Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-24 13:55]:
> "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * Martin Kjeldsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-24 12:25]:
> >> I understand this as the hash entry with key 'array' get
> >> assigned a array consisting of $count number multiplied by
> >> $scale. If that is right, we must be modifying $arg_for
> >> (%buckets) since we are adding an entry to the hash.
> >
> > $arg_for is a reference to a hash. The hash is modified, but
> > not the reference to it.
> It's probably an unimplemented/buggy feature of Pugs.

Err I think you misread my mail. I meant that the code modifies
the hash, but does nothing to modify the reference, so there is
no need to make the reference read-write.

Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

Reply via email to