I tried to describe what I know so far:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Tobias Leich <em...@froggs.de> wrote:
> This is in discussion right now, and since the recent pipe() addition,
> we have another bit implemented to actually make your proposal work.
> Though, we've not yet decided where we want to go, how one opens such a
> pipe or captures stdout/err, or does redirections of said handles...
> I hope we can say more in a few weeks.
> Am 02.01.2015 um 15:37 schrieb Gabor Szabo:
> > I see there are 'run' and 'shell' functions that return the exit
> > status in Proc::Status, and QX that returns the output. Wouldn't it be
> > better to have a function the returns and object that contains both
> > the status, the stdout and the stderr?
> > e.g. extending Proc::Status to be able to hold those as well and
> > changing QX to return
> > that object?
> > Gabor