The combination of different numbers on separate lines looks clearest to me.
On 9/14/15, yary <not....@gmail.com> wrote: > Keep it on separate lines, I don't know how that formatting got lost (it's > showing up as separate lines in my history). > > As for the rest of it, curious as to consensus. > > -y > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:06 PM, David H. Adler <d...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 03:13:21PM -0400, yary wrote: >> > Using different numbers for the examples helps visualize what's >> > initialized vs added later: >> ... >> > *[1 2 3]next[1 2 3 3]next[1 2 3 3 3]* >> >> I don't know. I think, by having it on separate lines, and watching the >> row of '1's extend, is less visually complicated and gets the point >> across more directly. >> >> [1 1 1 1] >> next >> [1 1 1 1 1 1] >> next >> [1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1] >> >> How strongly do people feel about this? >> >> dha >> >> -- >> David H. Adler - <d...@pobox.com> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/ >> Damn, if this doesn't win me "Pedant of the Year", I don't know what >> will. - Mark Rogaski >> >
