On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:59:04PM +0200, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
> > designers for having a very good reason and i'm curious: what is actually
> > this good reason for such a weird behave.
>
> Well, for one, it is according to spec. :-)
:)
> But the real reason, is that you can also use <a> to indicate the
> value of a key in a hash:
> my %h = a => 42;
> dd %h<a>;
well .. ok ... i'll deal with it.
> > %< class foo id bar >
>
> That is really a slice on an unnamed hash. So that is ambiguous.
an unnamed hash ? does it make sense?
> > [ ] i missed the good paragraph of the documentation ?
> > [ ] i'm going to do something very stupid ?
> > [ ] other, your answer here
>
> $ 6 'dd %(<a b c d>)’
> Hash % = {:a("b"), :c("d")}
> > * i just don't know way i need | in front of % ... it just works but for
> > me %() was enought and explicit on what i wanted to get. can someone
> > explain ?
>
> I guess without the |, you would pass a Hash to br.
i forgot to send the link. it was built with
https://github.com/eiro/p6-Rototo/blob/master/lib/Rototo.pm#L11
> became a list of pairs. Can’t really tell without the br code. But,
> fwiw, I don’t think you need the prefix % at all :-)
i do 'cause of the signature (*%attrs)
thanks for your answer!
cya
--
Marc Chantreux (eiro on github and freenode)
http://eiro.github.com/
http://eiro.github.com/atom.xml
"Don't believe everything you read on the Internet"
-- Abraham Lincoln
