On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:45 PM, yary <not....@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen <l...@dijkmat.nl>
> wrote:
> > “with” is completely agnostic about what it is working on.  It merely
> checks for definedness and sets the topicalizer if so.
> Hmm- what's the  benefit of with's defined check? Seems like it makes
> "with" break if used with type objects.

But for that there is "given". I thought the whole point of "with" vs.
"given" was the definedness check.

brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allber...@gmail.com                                  ballb...@sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net

Reply via email to