On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:45 PM, yary <not....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen <l...@dijkmat.nl>
> > “with” is completely agnostic about what it is working on. It merely
> checks for definedness and sets the topicalizer if so.
> Hmm- what's the benefit of with's defined check? Seems like it makes
> "with" break if used with type objects.
But for that there is "given". I thought the whole point of "with" vs.
"given" was the definedness check.
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net