if you can:
$s ~~ "foo"
$s ~~ /foo/
then wouldn't be good to have also:
$s.contains("foo");
$s.contains(/foo/);
IOW, overload .contains() with Str and Regex
F
On 06/12/2017 10:42 AM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
On 12 Jun 2017, at 01:27, ToddAndMargo <toddandma...@zoho.com> wrote:
perl6 -e 'my $x = "\t"; if $x !~~ /<[A..Z a..z 0..9]>/ {say "out"} else {say
"in"}'
Would this be easier to do with $x.contains? Or would it
be too worky?
.contains only takes a *single string* to look up. So it is only useful for
checking whether “foo” exists in “foo bar”:
say “foo bar”.contains(“foo”)
Liz
