On 09/28/2017 09:43 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:32 AM, ToddAndMargo <toddandma...@zoho.com
<mailto:toddandma...@zoho.com>> wrote:
$ perl6 -e 'my %x = [aaa => "x", b=>@["y","q","r"], c=>"z"]; say %x;
for @(%x<b>) {say $_};'
{aaa => x, b => [y q r], c => z}
y
q
r
This seems too easy. I have to have done something wrong.
What did I miss?
Only that it's even easier than you think: the @ was unnecessary when
building it. Perl 6 handles this kind of thing much better than Perl 5.
And there are other ways to spell the destructuring as well.
pyanfar Z$ 6 'my %x = [aaa => "x", b=>["y","q","r"], c=>"z"]; say
%x; for %x<b>[*] {say $_};'
{aaa => x, b => [y q r], c => z}
y
q
r
Thank you!
I will probably use the @ for a while until I get use to
it for readability.
