> On 15 Sep 2018, at 00:12, Vadim Belman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> In Perl 6 culture we never mix them up either, but we also never put subs
>> into packages by default. The reason Foo::bar notation doesn't work is
>> because bar isn't in Foo anymore unless you explicitly put it there.
> Though technically this aspect was clear to me, but to settle things down in
> my mind completely: for now ordinary (not 'our') sub belongs not to the
> package object but to the block which belongs to that package. Is it correct
> way to describe things?
Yes.
And you can even introspect it:
{
sub foo() { }
# check out this scope’s lexpad for subroutines
.say for MY::.keys.grep: *.starts-with('&’); # &foo
}
# check out outer scope’s lexpad for subroutines
say for MY::.keys.grep: *.starts-with('&’); # nothing
