A snippet: my @a = 1..10; put +@a.so; # output 1 put so(+@a); # output True put (+@a).so; # output True
This caught me because I used +@s.so when I tried to do something like: # in a class with 'has Bool $.pass;' return unless ( $!pass = +@a.so ); # fails with a Type mismatch of Int being assigned to Bool Is this an expected result, or a bug?(I was going to ask this on StackOverflow, but it seems so like a bug that I decided to ask here first)
