Re: Roles are fundamentally broken?

[Vadim Belman]

> On Jan 29, 2019, at 3:43 AM, Simon Proctor <simon.proc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think part of the issue is that fundamentally Roles are intended to be a 
> way of doing non inheritance based classes. So composing Roles from other 
> Roles is an anti pattern. 

But why? As I stated in my previous reply: isn't it constraining for the 
purpose of constraining? To me Perl was always TMTOWTDI in first place. The 
current approach to roles contradicts this principle.

Best regards,
Vadim Belman