I suggest making this a problem-solving issue: https://github.com/raku/problem-solving
> On 11 Dec 2021, at 05:48, Timothy Nelson <wayl...@wayland.id.au> wrote: > > Hi all. > > I've been lurking on this list for years (and once won an "oldest resurrected > conversation" award). I've loved Raku conceptually since the start, but have > only recently been putting it to much use. Mostly, the reality is as good as > the promises, but there are two areas I have been liking a bit less. One of > these is Phasers. The idea is a great one, but after going to them numerous > times and often not finding what I want, I've come to the conclusion that > they need some remodelling. > > That's a big step in a language that's been around for a while like Raku has. > Maybe this is a discussion for the Raku 2.0 standard (if there will be such > a thing), or maybe it's something that can be introduced over time (or as a > Slang, or something). Anyway, after thinking about them for a while, and > having my thoughts coalesce into a document over the last few days, I thought > I'd post the document to this mailing list and see what people think. I have > put in a number of hours today trying to make it more readable, but still may > not have gotten the ordering right. > > I'm fully aware that there may be drawbacks that I haven't thought of, but if > one useful idea comes from this document, then that's a step in the right > direction. > > Thanks all, > <PhasersMkIIDocumentation.pdf>
