On Monday 09 April 2007, SonOfLilit wrote: > So you basically say nothing more than "Haskell has a buggy > implementation and the OSes I use are C so it's easier to communicate > with them in C, no need for FFIs"? > > > Aur >
Hi Aur! Please don't take it the wrong way, but you are annoying and you completely mis-interpret me. I gave many reasons, but you only focus on one. I have a policy against emails sent to me in private: http://www.shlomifish.org/meta/FAQ/#should_i_email Please IM me ( http://www.shlomifish.org/me/contact-me/ ) if you want to continue this discussion. Regards, Shlomi Fish > On 4/9/07, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Aur! (and all) > > > > On Monday 09 April 2007, SonOfLilit wrote: > > > Hi Shlomi, > > > > > > This is Aur (from Israel.rb). > > > > Israel.rb == Ruby-IL. > > > > > I've read your "When C is the best tool for the job" article. > > > > Just for the record it is here: > > > > http://www.shlomifish.org/philosophy/computers/when-c-is-best/ > > > > > My impression is that after promising to deal with the list of claims: > > > (1) * "Java and/or .NET are better than C in every way.". > > > (2) * "Perl/Python/PHP/Ruby/Tcl are better than C." > > > (3) * "LISP is better than C". > > > (4) * "If you need speed, use O'Caml or Haskell - don't bother with > > > C." (5) * "C is for kernels." > > > , you only deal with (1), (2), (5). > > > > Actually, these and many similar claims are encountered times and again > > on the Net. I tried to address the common theme. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.shlomifish.org/ If it's not in my E-mail it doesn't happen. And if my E-mail is saying one thing, and everything else says something else - E-mail will conquer. -- An Israeli Linuxer _______________________________________________ Perl mailing list [email protected] http://perl.org.il/mailman/listinfo/perl
