On 10/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > s/(.)\1+/$1/g must be rather suitable, I suppose. >
Nope -- Offer Kaye _______________________________________________ Perl mailing list [email protected] http://perl.org.il/mailman/listinfo/perl
On 10/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > s/(.)\1+/$1/g must be rather suitable, I suppose. >
Nope -- Offer Kaye _______________________________________________ Perl mailing list [email protected] http://perl.org.il/mailman/listinfo/perl