Thanks - helped me Roey
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Yuval Kogman <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm the author of C::W. > > C::W is more of a framework and Workflow is more of a product. > > Workflow comes with its own XML format, logging, authorization, > persistence etc, but suffers in flexibility and simplicity as a > result. > > With Class::Workflow you need to glue the various features together. > Persistence is not complicated (see DBIx::Class example in the > distribution, and KiokuDB is easier). > > 2009/6/7 Roey Almog (Infoneto Ltd) <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > > > I need to get a decision of either using Class::Workflow or Workflow > > > > key points: > > Easier to learn. > > Easy to maintain code I base on it > > Better support. > > Has some kind of persistence or it is easy to implement one. > > > > Can any one put some light on it ? > > > > Roey > > _______________________________________________ > > Perl mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.perl.org.il/mailman/listinfo/perl > > > _______________________________________________ > Perl mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.perl.org.il/mailman/listinfo/perl _______________________________________________ Perl mailing list [email protected] http://mail.perl.org.il/mailman/listinfo/perl
