Hi sawyer, On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:20:03 +0300 sawyer x <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Shlomi Fish <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 01:11:48 +0300 > > sawyer x <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Shlomi Fish <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > as The Perl Foundation has published a call for grant proposals (see > > > > http://news.perlfoundation.orgseems > > > > /2012/07/2012q3-call-for-grant-proposal.html< > > http://news.perlfoundation.org/2012/07/2012q3-call-for-grant-proposal.html > > >), > > > > I've written this grant proposal and I would appreciate if you can go > > over > > > > it > > > > and comment before I send the final copy: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.shlomifish.org/Files/files/text/tpf-grants/Perl-Debugger-Tests-And-Refactoring.pod > > > > > > > > > > It seems succinct, whereas I would elaborate more. > > > > > > 1. How many tests are you going to add? You wrote "most of the commands > > > listed in the manual" - what does that mean? Which commands? Why? > > > 2. What does "a method to find lines in the debuggers" mean? I don't > > > understand the 2nd clause in the "Inch-stones". > > > 3. Which lines? What does it mean "add tests for [...] lines"? > > > 4. The schedule is rough. Perhaps creating a broader schedule would allow > > > you to take your time, but still provide a time-frame for TPF to estimate > > > your progress? > > > 5. The "Completeness Criteria" does not include the criteria for > > > completeness. It just means it will be available for review and merge > > > (which is good!), but perhaps you actually want to write down how to know > > > when you're done - what you consider "completeness". > > > 6. The amount seems high considering you cannot divide it to a specific > > > amount of hours to prove that it's worthwhile and not expensive. > > > > > > > so I implemented your suggestions and they can be found here: > > > > > > http://www.shlomifish.org/Files/files/text/tpf-grants/Perl-Debugger-Tests-And-Refactoring.pod > > > > Nicely done. It reads much clearer now and I understand much more. I reckon > that's important for big grants such as this (and by "big", I mean > influential). OK. > > I noticed the sentence "add automated more tests", I think you meant "add > more automated tests". Yes, thanks. I corrected it now. > > > > Regarding the "completeness" section - I just filled the text in the > > template: > > > > http://www.shlomifish.org/Files/files/text/tpf-grants/template.pod > > > > > Maybe I misunderstood. > > > > That does fit the template, but that still leaves (at least to me) > something to be desired: how would I know you completed it? However, since > you've now added specifically what you want to add support for, it's much > clearer. :) > > Good luck with the grant! :) OK, thanks. Regards, Shlomi Fish -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ Funny Anti-Terrorism Story - http://shlom.in/enemy Chuck Norris read the entire English Wikipedia in 24 hours. Twice. Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . _______________________________________________ Perl mailing list [email protected] http://mail.perl.org.il/mailman/listinfo/perl
