yonghua <[email protected]> writes: > 相同的文件名、LIB名，perl只会load一次，见%INC的描述。 > do是强制load，它与require和use的区别请见： > > perldoc -q 'What's the difference between require and use?' perldoc 也能这样用啊,很惭愧，现在才知道。 > > -- > yonghua peng > http://home.arcor.de/pangj/ > > > --- On Fri, 1/16/09, Xiaojun Deng <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Xiaojun Deng <[email protected]> >> Subject: [PerlChina] Re: perl标量与列表和散列的一点疑问 >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Friday, January 16, 2009, 12:36 PM >> 如果两个文件有相同名字的变量，require或者import后会不会覆盖掉呢，怎么用 >> 名字空间来区别的阿？ 还有这些和do >> "some_perl_file"有何区别呢？ >> >> On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 11:10 +0800, smallfish wrote: >> > 学习了。 >> > >> 一直都是按照第一和第二个方法采用our共享变量的。 >> > >> > -- >> > blog : http://hi.baidu.com/smallfish7788 >> > bbs : http://bbs.chinaunix.net/forum-55-1.html >> > smallfish(xiaoyu9805119) >> > >> > -------------------------------------------------- >> > From: "yonghua" >> <[email protected]> >> > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 11:03 AM >> > To: <[email protected]> >> > Subject: [PerlChina] Re: >> perl标量与列表和散列的一点疑问 >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > --- On Fri, 1/16/09, [email protected] >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> From: [email protected] >> <[email protected]> >> > >> Subject: [PerlChina] Re: >> perl标量与列表和散列的一点疑问 >> > >> To: [email protected] >> > >> Date: Friday, January 16, 2009, 10:50 AM >> > >> “There's more than one way to do it” >> > >> 简单易用就好吧，面向对象之类的 >> > >> >> 都是一个想法而已，C也可以写成面向对象的风格啊 >> > > >> > > >> > > >> 不是想法不想法的问题，而是某些情形下，OO可以节省内存、提高性能。 >> > > >> 跟老外合作过不少MP项目，这方面深有体会。 >> > > 写过一篇FAQ release在mailing >> lists上，看看或许有所参考： >> > > >> > > >> http://home.arcor.de/pangj/share_variables_between_perl_scripts.txt >> > > >> > > >> > > Jeff. >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> >> > > --
Thanks & Regards Changying Li --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ 您收到此信息是由于您订阅了 Google 论坛“PerlChina 论坛”论坛。 要在此论坛发帖，请发电子邮件到 [email protected] 要退订此论坛，请发邮件至 [email protected] 更多选项，请通过 http://groups.google.com/group/perlchina?hl=zh-CN 访问该论坛 -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
