4b) synchronise dual-life modules with CPAN 是啥意思呀？ 2009/2/24 purl lamp <[email protected]>: > From: > Dave Mitchell > Date: > February 23, 2009 09:59 > Subject: > current 5.10.1 release schedule > > Here's the current timetable for 5.10.1 (such as it is): > > 1) Finish off the backlog of merging from bleed (~ 2 weeks) > > 2) dampen any smoking fires > > 3) push out a snapshot, principally to check that the merged changes and > module updates all seem okay > > 4a) fix smartmatching and known regressions from 5.8.x > 4b) synchronise dual-life modules with CPAN > 4c) dampen any remaining smoke > 4d) finish perldelta > > 5) push out RC1 and wait a week; rinse and repeat as necessary > > Note thate there won't be a single code-freeze point as such; more a > gradually increasing level of paranoia. However, after 1) and 2) I don't > envisage merging any scary changes, so in particular if a major dual-life > module update gets into bleed after that date, it's unlikely to get merged > into bleed. After that point, I will probably only be interested in module > updates that backport a bleed version to CPAN. > > > 2009/2/20 CGI.NET <[email protected]> >> >> 一直都想用下perl 5.10的写法，但无奈太多机器基本都是5.8的，所以还是老实的按以前的写法来写 >> 不过我开发用的已经是5.10，虽然是WIN版的 >> >> On 2月19日, 上午9时50分, agentzh <[email protected]> wrote: >> > 2009/2/18 Michael Zeng <[email protected]> >> > >> > > 还有say， 向perl 6 发展了 >> > >> > 对我自己来说，其实 perl 5.10.x 最激动人心的不是这些 perl 6 >> > 风格的语言特性，而是一个快了好多好多同时功能也强了好多的正则引擎！哈哈！ >> > >> > Benchmark 显示，我们的 OpenResty 测试集在同一台 Ubuntu Linux 上，使用 perl 5.10.0 比 perl >> > 5.8.8 快了 10% ~ 20% 的样子。于是我把我手上的生产机全布署上自己编译的 perl 5.10.0 了，呵呵。 >> > >> > Cheers, >> > -agentzh >> > > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ 您收到此信息是由于您订阅了 Google 论坛“PerlChina Mongers 讨论组”论坛。 要在此论坛发帖，请发电子邮件到 [email protected] 要退订此论坛，请发邮件至 [email protected] 更多选项，请通过 http://groups.google.com/group/perlchina?hl=zh-CN 访问该论坛 -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
