Edward (Post Doc) Hyer wrote: > With regular Perl subroutines, doing simple things, my habit had been > for them to simply > return; > if something went wrong. This meant I could simply check whether the > output was defined to determine of the routine had done its job, as is > standard Perl SOP. > > With routines that are supposed to return PDLs, this is trickier.
Most PDL routines return piddles to allow for operation chaining. > Basically, I'm having trouble finding a routine that I can use to sort > PDLs and other output. If I test the output, it barfs "multielement > piddle in conditional expression" if it gets a PDL. If I used nelem(), > well, nelem(undef) == 1. > > TMTOWTDY, but the other ways are definitely uphill from a simple ispdl() > function that can test for PDLness. I can't believe there's no such > function-- there must be! perldoc -f ref > Help me out, > > --EJH. _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
