I haven't had a problem with compilation. I'm not the maintainer, and
thus not expert.
Did you do a
perl Makefile.PL
before your build ?
Did a normal make build correctly ?
Did you do a (sudo) make install ?
Maggie X wrote:
> PDL-LinearAlgebra-0.06 fails at make test
>
> t/1....Can't load
> '/.../PDL-LinearAlgebra-0.06/blib/arch/auto/PDL/LinearAlgebra/Real/Real.so'
> for module PDL::LinearAlgebra::Real: /usr/lib/atlas/libblas.so.3gf:
> undefined symbol: _gfortran_st_write_done at
> /usr/lib/perl/5.8/DynaLoader.pm line 225.
> at /.../PDL-LinearAlgebra-0.06/blib/lib/PDL/LinearAlgebra.pm line 10
> Compilation failed in require at
> /.../PDL-LinearAlgebra-0.06/blib/lib/PDL/LinearAlgebra.pm line 10.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
> /.../PDL-LinearAlgebra-0.06/blib/lib/PDL/LinearAlgebra.pm line 10.
> Compilation failed in require at t/1.t line 3.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/1.t line 3.
> t/1....dubious
>
> Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
> FAILED--1 test script could be run, alas--no output ever seen
> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 2
>
> I would love to try out the lapack routines if it actually installs, or
> eigen if it is incorporated into PDL. Right now for a PCA of about 2800
> x 2800, R can do the same job at least twice as fast as my routine using
> PDL::PP code and PDL::Slatec.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Maggie
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Jan Hoogenraad
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>
> For most matrix manipulations, routein provided by the lapack library
> are quite good. I recommend the Linear Algebra package as an interface:
>
> http://search.cpan.org/~ellipse/PDL-LinearAlgebra-0.06
> <http://search.cpan.org/%7Eellipse/PDL-LinearAlgebra-0.06>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
