OK then that sounds like a good plan! You'd have to look at the f2c output and see what other stuff might be called. Given that SLATEC has not been modified in years it's a nice case of only having to do it once.
Karl On 12/11/2009, at 10:43 AM, Chris Marshall wrote: >> >> I'd much rather see a quick and less than perfect stab at it (not >> that I would have time to contribute much). > > I think the slatec f2c conversion would not take much work > since with less than 20 lines of IO to worry about, I think > hand replacing with C printf et. al. should not be too > onerous to implement. > > --Chris _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
