Hi,
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Puneet, > > I'm CCing Gabor Szabo here, who is a Padre developer. If possible, please > subscribe to http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev and continue > the discussion there. Shlomi thanks for CC-ing me though I am also on the perldl list I am just too busy with many other things I have been doing. > > On Tuesday 20 Apr 2010 17:28:21 P Kishor wrote: >> >> Padre still choked up saying that it won't work because >> Wx-Perl-ProcessStream was broken on Perl 5.10.1 on a Mac! By this time >> my risk-reward ratio was close to skewing unfavorably. >> > > OK, Gabor, is this a known problem? Nope. http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Wx-Perl-ProcessStream+0.27 seems to indicate that it can pass its tests though that report does not distinguish between the various versions of Mac OSX. >> Maybe I will try Padre once it reaches v. 1.0, or when its reported >> benefits become too high to ignore, esp. vis a vis PDL. >> > > I'm not sure that the Padre version 1.00 will be any more significant than > just bumping from 0.99 to 1.00. Padre is still very stable on most places, and > some people have been using it. I don't know what the focus will be in the > next releases, but you should try to get Padre working on your OS X machine > much earlier than that. I don't think that version numbers will matter. So far we were sticking to the $VERSION += 0.01; scheme regardless of importance of release. We know that Mac is a blind spot for us but the only way out from that as I can see is to get some Mac users start helping packaging. I've heard that the using pkgsrc http://padre.perlide.org/trac/wiki/Download#NetBSDpkgsrc should also work but I have not tried it. >> I do appreciate though that a community of developers is dedicated to >> creating a perl-specific IDE. Of course, no project (at least, none of >> my own projects) uses only one language. I typically work on web based >> projects, so I need one environment for html, css, javascript, SQL and >> perl. I realize that any one environment that can do all these will be >> less efficient at all these (jack of all and master of none, and all >> that), but from a usability point of view, me having to learn only one >> IDE will make me more efficient. Always a trade-off of some sort. > > Well, I expect that Padre would be able to support these (given their > relevance to Perl), and one can also write plugins to implement support for > other technologies (though you'll naturally need to write them in Perl.). Padre already has some level of support for all of these languages in the forms of plugins. I hope people with some tuits on their hand will improve these further. Gabor _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
