On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:12 AM, David Mertens <[email protected]> wrote: >> http://stackoverflow.com/search?q=pdl > > Maybe. I don't know if it would really work well until there was a larger > presence of PDL users in general. However, if you regularly find yourself > reading stackoverflow and somebody poses a PDL question that you can't (or > don't want to) answer, you can always send a note to this list. Personally, > I don't have the time or inclination to add Stackoverflow to my list of > regular reading.
I feel similar. I don't feel inclined to add Stackoverflow to my list of sites to visit. > Yes, better code display in emails would be nice. A quick google search for > Mailman and code highlighting didn't turn anything up, though, so such > features would only be available if we used a forum setting, like > Stackoverflow. (But wouldn't it be cool if we could have mailman add > highlighting to stuff inside [perl] tags?) This would only work for HTML emails. A lot of people (me included when I fix the SMTP issue) set their email clients to display emails as plain text. That said, I don't object to mangling HTML emails. My client will strip out the extra tags anyway. Daniel -- No trees were killed in the generation of this message. A large number of electrons were, however, severely inconvenienced. _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
