Hi guys, Ok, here is a major update to the logo competition:
1) After adding the votes from Chris, I removed all the logos that were left with zero votes. I kept the recent proposal from Maggie (AQ) and a new one from Hadar (AU). I want to give every submission at least a full day to receive votes. But other than this, I didn't add any new logos because I think we are ready to start converging on a logo. 2) I re-arranged the logos, separating them by the number of votes. And the two recent logos from Maggie and Hadar can be seen on the top-right corner. What I would like now is for everyone who has already voted to have a second look at the logos and decide if and how you would like to update your vote. For example: * AR is almost identical to Y. * AS, AT are very similar to H and K. * C2 and C3 are similar to P. I would like to remove some of the duplication. Duplication was great when we were testing ideas, but I think now is time to narrow the options. And above all, I want to avoid choosing a logo we don't actually like because of a split vote (e.g. between H,K and AS,AT). Cheers, Daniel. On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Chris Marshall <[email protected]> wrote: > New list of likes including the additions: > > U AN AT AR AS C3 AF > > I still think N is nice but it doesn't connect > with PDL as much as I would like... > > Cheers, > Chris > -- Intolerant people should be shot. _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
